SCHEDULE DATA
International Football Tournament Stadium & Digital Ticketing Project
- Document Information
- Project Manager: Alex
- Version: 1.0
- Date: 10 December 2025
- Status: Supporting Schedule Artifact
- Related Documents:
- Activity List
- Network Diagram
- Schedule Management Plan
- Assumption Log
- Purpose
Schedule Data provides the supporting information required to develop, analyze, and control the schedule model.
It documents:
- Assumptions
- Constraints
- Leads & lags
- Calendars
- Activity attributes
- Contingency reserves
- Risk-based duration ranges
It ensures schedule transparency and auditability.
- Activity Attributes (Key Examples)
Below are representative attributes for critical activities.
A-603 – Lay Turf Surface
- WBS ID: 2.6
- Responsible: Turf Subcontractor
- Activity Type: External specialized installation
- Predecessor: A-602 (Install drainage) – FS
- Constraint: Cannot begin before enclosure weather-tight
- Assumption: Weather conditions within seasonal norms
- Risk Link: R-12 (Weather delay risk)
- Duration Basis: Expert judgment + historical stadium data
- Float Sensitivity: Near-critical
A-803 – Gate Functional Testing
- WBS ID: 2.8
- Responsible: Construction Seller
- Dependency: Utilities commissioned (A-903) – FS
- Assumption: Firmware version stable
- Interface Risk: Requires digital identity module for integration
- Risk Link: R-18 (Hardware–software incompatibility)
A-1201 – Gate ↔ App Integration
- WBS ID: 4.1
- Responsible: Integration Lead
- Predecessors:
- A-803 (Gate testing) – FS
- A-1103 (Identity verification) – FS
- A-1104 (Ticket issuance) – FS
- Activity Type: Hybrid cross-domain
- Assumption: API specifications frozen
- Risk Link: R-22 (Interface misalignment)
- Float Sensitivity: Critical path candidate
- Schedule Assumptions
- Turf installation window is seasonally feasible.
- Construction seller resource availability is stable.
- Identity verification vendor API will not change.
- Regulatory inspections occur within statutory timelines.
- Integration testing environment available on schedule.
All assumptions are cross-referenced in the Assumption Log.
- Schedule Constraints
Type | Description |
Hard | Tournament start June 2030 (immovable) |
Regulatory | Occupancy permit required before handover |
Contractual | Crane demobilization fees if delay > X days |
External | Cybersecurity audit window fixed by authority |
- Project Calendars
Construction Calendar
- 6 working days/week
- No work during severe weather alerts
- National holidays excluded
Digital Team Calendar
- 5-day sprint cycle
- 2-week sprint duration
- Fixed sprint cadence
Integration Calendar
- Shared access windows for physical site
- Restricted nighttime testing allowed
- Leads and Lags
- No leads permitted on safety-critical path.
- Turf curing period represented as explicit lag between A-603 and A-604.
- Regulatory inspection buffer represented as contingency reserve, not lag.
Lag Example:
- A-603 → A-604: FS + 14 days (turf conditioning period)
- Contingency Reserves
Contingency time is allocated based on risk exposure:
Area | Reserve Allocation |
Turf installation | 10 days |
Integration testing | 7 days |
Regulatory approval | 14 days |
Cybersecurity clearance | 5 days |
Reserves are visible and tracked.
They are not hidden inside activity durations.
- Risk-Based Duration Ranges (for Monte Carlo)
Example:
Activity | Optimistic | Most Likely | Pessimistic |
Turf Installation | 18d | 24d | 35d |
Gate Integration | 8d | 12d | 20d |
Load Testing | 5d | 7d | 12d |
Used for quantitative schedule risk analysis.
- Critical Path Sensitivity Notes
Current near-critical chain:
Turf certification → Integrated stadium testing → Occupancy permit → Handover
Hybrid critical chain:
Gate testing + Identity verification + Ticket issuance
→ Gate ↔ App integration
→ End-to-End test
→ UAT
→ Handover
These are monitored as cross-stream sensitivity paths.
- Schedule Data Control
- Updated at each schedule review cycle
- Changes require PM approval
- Linked to risk register updates
- Historical versions archived for audit
Â